Legislation Details

File #: LN-892    Version: Name:
Type: ZBA Submission Status: Regular Agenda Ready
File created: 6/25/2026 In control: Zoning Board of Appeals
On agenda: 10/15/2026 Final action:
Title: VARIANCE - SHINING HILL DEVELOPMENTS USA INC
Attachments: 1. Updated Staff Report_26-11000016.pdf, 2. 00_Application-Owners Certificate.pdf, 3. 01_Revised Narrative-Review Standards.pdf, 4. 02_Survey.pdf, 5. 03_Revised Site Plan.pdf, 6. 04_East View.pdf, 7. 04_North View.pdf, 8. 04_South View.pdf, 9. Legal Description_26-11000016.pdf, 10. OCTOBER PublicNotice_26-11000016.pdf, 11. AerialMap_26-11000016.pdf, 12. Fire Memo - 26-11000016.pdf, 13. Public Correspondence - Christie, William.pdf, 14. Public Correspondence - Siervo, Mario.pdf, 15. Public Correspondence - Moor, Molly.pdf

boardname

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

Meeting Date: OCTOBER 15, 2026

 

title

VARIANCE - SHINING HILL DEVELOPMENTS USA INC

 

projectinfo

Request:                     Variance

P&Z#                     26-11000016

Owner:                     Shining Hill Developments USA Inc

Project Location:                     1900 Bay Dr

Folio Number:                     484329041220

Land Use Designation:                     L (Low 1-5 DU/AC)

Zoning District:                     RS-2 (Single Family Residence 2)

Commission District:                     1 (Audrey Fesik)

Agent:                      Jay Lefka

Project Planner:                     Scott Reale

 

otherinfo

 

 

 

 

Summary:                      

The Applicant Landowner requests a variance from Section 155.3203(C) of the Pompano Beach Zoning Code regarding the required 25-foot waterfront setback. The requested variance would permit an elevated swimming pool to be located 15’-3” from the rear property line and a rear egress staircase to be located 11’-9” from the rear property line. 

 

The application is a rehearing of a variance request previously denied by the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 16, 2026. The Applicant has revised the site plan to reduce the extent of the requested encroachment in response to concerns raised by the Board.

 

The subject property is located on the east side of Bay Drive, between Barton Road and Dow Street, in the Hillsboro Shores section of the barrier island.

 

ZONING REGULATIONS

§155.3203. SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 2 (RS-2)

…

C. Intensity and Dimensional Standards

…

Setback from a waterway or canal, minimum: 25 feet

 

 

 

PROPERTY INFORMATION AND STAFF ANALYSIS

1.                     The subject property is a vacant waterfront lot located east of the Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) established by the State of Florida and is subject to additional coastal construction and flood protection regulations administered by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). The eastern half of the property is located in the Wahoo Bay.

2.                     The applicant proposes to construct a new two-story single-family residence, swimming pool, and associated site improvements. Pursuant to Section 155.3203(C) of the Zoning Code, principal structures on waterfront lots within the RS-2 Zoning District are required to maintain a minimum setback of 25 feet from an abutting waterway or canal. The proposed elevated pool support structure and associated pool equipment/service area would be located 15’-3” from the rear property line, resulting in a 9’-9” encroachment into the required waterfront setback. An exterior egress stair would be located 11’-9” from the rear property line, resulting in a 13’-3” encroachment.

3.                     According to the applicant, the principal living area of the residence is required to be elevated above the applicable flood elevation pursuant to state and federal floodplain management regulations. The Applicant has elected to elevate the swimming pool to approximately the same level as the primary living area to facilitate direct access from the residence. The elevated pool therefore requires a structural support system and associated mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems beneath the pool. The Applicant further states that the exterior egress stair is required to provide code-compliant access from the elevated living level to the rear yard. Because the elevated pool support structure and exterior stair are physically connected to the principal structure and extend above natural grade, they are subject to the 25-foot waterfront setback applicable to principal structures.

4.                     This application was initially denied by the ZBA on July 16, 2026. A rehearing request was subsequently granted, and the applicant has since revised their site plan to decrease the proposed encroachments based on the concerns raised by the Board. The original application proposed a 5-foot setback, resulting in a 20-foot encroachment into the required waterfront setback. The revised proposal increases the setback to 15’-3” for the elevated pool support structure and 11’-9” for the exterior egress stair.

5.                     The applicant contends that the property is affected by extraordinary and exceptional conditions due to the presence of the remaining portion of Wahoo Bay and a state-protected mangrove preserve located east of the property. The applicant further states that these conditions, combined with the property’s location seaward of the Coastal Construction Control Line and associated flood elevation requirements, create design constraints that are not generally applicable to other waterfront properties in the vicinity.

6.                     The proposed encroachment consists primarily of structural and access components associated with the elevated pool and the required means of egress, rather than enclosed habitable floor area. No enclosed habitable space is proposed within the required waterfront setback area.

7.                     The surrounding area is predominantly developed with single-family residential uses. The Applicant has revised the proposal in response to the concerns raised by the Board at the July 16, 2026 meeting, substantially reducing the requested encroachment from the original request. Staff recognizes the Applicant’s efforts to address the Board’s concerns and minimize the extent of the requested relief. Based on the revised plans and the reduced extent of the requested variance, staff has no objection to approval of the request, subject to the recommended conditions of approval.

 

 

 

 

 

 

LAND USE PATTERNS

Subject Property (Zoning District | Existing Use):

•                     RS-2 | vacant residential lot

 

Surrounding Properties (Zoning District | Existing Use):

•                     North: RS-2 | Single-family dwelling

•                     South: RS-2 | Single-family dwelling

•                     West: RS-2 | Single-family dwelling

•                     East: W | Wahoo Bay and mangrove area

 

 

 

 

 

VARIANCE REVIEW STANDARDS

A Variance application shall be approved only on a finding that there is competent substantial evidence in the record that all of the following standards are met:

a)                     There are extraordinary and exceptional conditions (such as topographic conditions, narrowness, shallowness, or the shape of the parcel of land) pertaining to the particular land or structure for which the Variance is sought, that do not generally apply to other lands or structures in the vicinity;

b)                     The extraordinary and exceptional conditions referred to in paragraph a., above, are not the result of the actions of the landowner;

c)                     Because of the extraordinary and exceptional conditions referred to in paragraph a., above, the application of this Code to the land or structure for which the Variance is sought would effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict the utilization of the land or structure and result in unnecessary and undue hardship;

d)                     The Variance would not confer any special privilege on the landowner that is denied to other lands or structures that are similarly situated.

e)                     The extent of the Variance is the minimum necessary to allow a reasonable use of the land or structure;

f)                     The Variance is in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this Code and preserves its spirit;

g)                     The Variance would not adversely affect the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood, be injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, or otherwise be detrimental to the public welfare; and

h)                     The Variance is consistent with the comprehensive plan.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Staff Conditions:                     

Should the Board determine that the applicant has provided competent and substantial evidence to satisfy the eight Variance review standards, staff recommends the Board include the following conditions as part of the Order:

1.                     The Applicant shall obtain all necessary governmental permits and approvals, including, but not limited to, Building, Zoning Compliance, Floodplain, and any applicable state or federal permits and approvals.

2.                     The Applicant shall substantially comply with the plans submitted with this Variance application. Any expansion, modification, or redesign of the principal structure or associated improvements that increases the degree of nonconformity shall require separate review and approval.

3.                     Approval of this Variance is limited solely to the elevated pool support structure, associated pool equipment/service area and exterior egress stair depicted on the revised site plan submitted with this application. No enclosed habitable floor area shall be permitted within the approved setback area.

4.                     The area beneath the elevated pool support structure shall remain open and accessible for the maintenance and servicing of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing systems and shall not be converted to storage, living area, or any other enclosed use.