title
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF POMPANO BEACH, FLORIDA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NOS. 2003-38 AND 2020-113, AND APPROVING THE REVISED STREETS, PARK AND FACILITY NAMING AND DUAL-NAMING PROCEDURES AND CRITERIA FOR THE CITY OF POMPANO BEACH; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
(Fiscal Impact: N/A)
POSTPONED FROM APRIL 27, 2021 & MAY 25, 2021
staffcontact
(Staff Contact: Robert McCaughan/Mark Beaudreau)
summary
Summary Explanation/Background:
At the two previous City Commission meetings, April 27 and May 25, 2021, the Commission voted to table this item.
At the May meeting the Commission provided input that the policy provide the authorization to approve naming of all City facilities after any persons, deceased or living, upon a determination that exceptional circumstances exist. Criteria #11 has been added to accommodate this request. The previous requests to dual name a street segment vice the entire street has been incorporated, as well as including the Pompano Beach Historical Society in the application review process.
It is important to note that the current process for dual-naming a street or facility involves no criteria, other than writing a check to cover the costs. While there have been no major controversies in the City with requests so far, other communities, both in and out of South Florida, have had issues. The most recent one involved street names associated with Confederate Generals. If someone were to approach the City with a potential controversial request, the Commission would have no pre-existing criteria to rely on for denial, other than just not approving it at a commission meeting. Moreover, residents living on the impacted street would not even possibly be aware that such a request was being made. Therefore, staff is recommending adopting a set of criteria so there is more structure and notification in the dual naming process.
Staff does not believe the proposed criteria will significantly limit the applications submitted or considered by the Commission. The recommendations in the proposed Resolution were derived through research staff did on other cities. The criteria recommended adds steps to the process before being placed on the agenda. Everyone who comes forth with a request will be aware and treated under the same criteria. Furthermore, when a request comes before the commission for consideration, the Commission can have the confidence that the application was properly vetted.
Origin of request for this action: Staff
Fiscal impact and source of funding: N/A
pagebreak1
strategicplan_emblem_field
pagebr
strategicplan_description_field