boardname
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: FEBRUARY 7, 2024
title
THE OAKS AT PALM AIRE - FLEX
projectinfo
Request: Flex
P&Z# 23-05000007
Owner: Clublink US, LLC
Project Location: 3701 Oaks Clubhouse Dr
Folio Number: 494205000047, 494205000020, 494205000047 & 494205000020
Land Use Designation: LM (Low-Medium 5-10 DU/AC)
Zoning District: RM-45 (Multiple-Family Residence 45)
Commission District: 5 (Barry Moss)
Agent: Scott Backman (561-405-3350 / sbackman@dmbblaw.com)
Project Planner: Jean Dolan (954-786-4045 / jean.dolan@copbfl.com)
otherinfo
Introduction:
The owner of the proposed project is ClubLink represented by Dunay, Miskel & Backman, LLP. The proposed project is located at 3701 Oaks Country Club Drive and includes a portion of the Oaks golf course. The residential parcel is folio 494205000047 (Parcel 1) and the recreational parcel is folio 494205000020 (Parcel 2). The Land use designation is “Palm Aire Dashed line area with underlying Residential” (Parcel 1) and “Palm Aire Dashed line area with Underlying Open Space Recreation” (Parcel 2). The proposed use of the residential parcel (Parcel 1) is 270 units generated by a combination of 39 moderate income flex units and Broward County Mixed Income Density Bonus Policy 2.16.3. which creates 234 bonus units (three units greater than requested) as a result of the 39 moderate income units restricted to affordable for 30-years. The proposed use of the recreational parcel (Parcel 2) is an updated and downsized Oaks Country Club clubhouse and operational area.
PLANNING
Plan Reviewer: Jean E. Dolan, AICP, CFM
Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
Comments:
1. Correct the Application form for the number of units and the Applicant and Applicant and Owner email since Matt Scott is no longer working on the project.
2. The square footage of the existing and proposed clubhouse in the narrative doesn't match the same in the Traffic Study.
3. 39x6=234. Correct the number of market rate units showing 231 in paragraph 3 on page 2 of the narrative.
4. In regard to Policy 01.05.01, include the County's FFE per the County's Flood Elevation map because the highest FFE based on all these maps will have to be considered when determining ultimate FFE.
5. Note that per Chapter 154.61.F.4, the bedroom mix of the affordable flex units must be proportional to the bedroom mix of the unrestricted units. This detail is not included in the sample Affordable Housing Declaration of Restrictive Covenants we previously shared and will have to be added.
6. Note that the flex request will go to P&Z approval concurrent with the site plan approval so these will continue to track together.
ZONING
Plan Reviewer: Pamela Stanton
Review Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
1. See site plan submittal PZ 23-12000017 for all site plan comments.
2. No objection to the allocation of Flex units.
LANDSCAPE
Plan Reviewer: Wade Collum
Review Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
Comments will be rendered on the landscape plans provided with the site plan submittal (23-12000017.
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Environmental Services Comments
Project Name: Oaks Clubhouse Redevelopment FLEX
Address: 103 Oaks Clubhouse Drive
P&Z#: 23-05000007
Review: 06/30/2023
DRC Meeting: 07/19/2023
REVIEW COMPLETE; NO OBJECTION TO FLEX APPLICATION
The Environmental Services Department has no objections to the proposed flex request. The site plan submitted with this application appears to have multiple issues with regard to garbage collection.
NOTE: Additional comments may be necessary based upon revisions, additional plans and/or documents. Contact Beth Dubow at 954-545-7047 or beth.dubow@copbfl.com should you have any questions or concerns regarding this review.
ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Plan Reviewer: David McGirr
Review Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
No comments.
BSO
Development Review Committee Reviewed:
Subject: CPTED and Security Strengthening Report:
Reviewer: BSO Deputy Patrick Noble #9436 for the City of Pompano Beach
Patrick_Noble@sheriff.org
M-(954) 709-7006 (Call, Text & Email; No Voicemail);
Monday - Thursday; 8 AM - 4 PM
Review Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
*** ATTENTION IMPORTANT ***
The services of an independent, and highly experienced, qualified and certified Security Crime Prevention/ CPTED Consultant are highly recommended to achieve and maintain objective credible security review integrity, and to expedite processing.
*** DISCLAIMER ***
This safety and security review does not guarantee a crime will never occur; it is an effort to mitigate opportunities for crime and to help avoid any present and future security deficiencies, conflicts, threats, breaches, or liabilities that might occur without any review.
*** Attention important ***
As per code 155.2407.e.9., at the time of site plan submittal, the CPTED security strengthening drawing plan and separate CPTED security strengthening drawing plan narrative shall both be submitted as part of the requirements for site plan review and approval.
UTILITIES
Nathaniel Watson
Review Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
Comments:
1. Please note that additional comments may be forthcoming based on the site plan review process.
2. The City of Pompano Beach Utilities Dept. has no comment at this time with regard to the requested flex allocation for the subject property.
BUILDING DIVISION
Plan Reviewer:
Review Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
No Review Necessary (NRN)
FIRE DEPARTMENT
This P&Z application is able to meet all of the Fire Department requirements at this time for FLEX REQUEST APPROVAL ONLY. Site plan approval will be required, maintaining all proper fire department access and water supply requirements as per chapter 18 of NFPA 1 as amended from time to time.
Review Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
*Additional comments may follow throughout the remainder of the permitting process. The buildings shall follow All NFPA Standards prior to receiving Fire Department approval.
CRA
Kimberly Vazquez
Review Status: Review Complete pending Development Order
Palm Aire is not within the CRA jurisdictional boundaries.